[Home] [Server] [Queue] [About] [Remove] [Statistics]

I-TASSER results for job id S776148

[Click on S776148_results.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modeling results listed on this page]


  Submitted Sequence in FASTA format

>protein
KEDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGIP
IAESRGSVPKDAKSTFCVMLRRYRGLKSGGFGVIGRPVSYEPFRLGLTFREAPEEARPDN
YMVSNGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILSQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYL
PQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEW
TSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLA
ETVSRPSETVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRADLKL

  Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300                 320
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   
KEDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGIPIAESRGSVPKDAKSTFCVMLRRYRGLKSGGFGVIGRPVSYEPFRLGLTFREAPEEARPDNYMVSNGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILSQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSETVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRADLKL
PredictionCCCSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSCCHHHHHHCCCCHHCCCCCHHHSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCHHHSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCC
Conf.Score986299999889906999872699986899442159818892363047889887620456554556666666437887430233333267433366320367999999824534566322234566403665112443334445112342057438999558845999646543568938377629948887879899999988787653376345520111689992799799999899999848999604999998866773316577467255666434456678899999999872557781578898865889999999998523788754569
H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

  Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300                 320
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   
KEDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGIPIAESRGSVPKDAKSTFCVMLRRYRGLKSGGFGVIGRPVSYEPFRLGLTFREAPEEARPDNYMVSNGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILSQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSETVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRADLKL
Prediction842000000006312000003103620603331033200000014611520251033423236644434663312011223433314343341564522010010101033244544446354441210000001321332242444316643320001121503021014302301313341003210010001200310140033014324244342322202010432200101020200202426423000011200434643421423647425137445563441353024104432346453045322520630041033026324346667
Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 9 (highly exposed residue)

   Predicted normalized B-factor

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)


  Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

(I-TASSER modeling starts from the structure templates identified by LOMETS from the PDB library. LOMETS is a meta-server threading approach containing multiple threading programs, where each threading program can generate tens of thousands of template alignments. I-TASSER only uses the templates of the highest significance in the threading alignments, the significance of which are measured by the Z-score, i.e. the difference between the raw and average scores in the unit of standard deviation. The templates in this section are the 10 best templates selected from the LOMETS threading programs. Usually, one template of the highest Z-score is selected from each threading program, where the threading programs are sorted by the average performance in the large-scale benchmark test experiments.)

Rank PDB
Hit		Iden1Iden2CovNorm.
Z-score		Download
Align.		                   20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300                 320
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   
Sec.Str
Seq		CCCSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSCCHHHHHHCCCCHHCCCCCHHHSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCHHHSSCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCC
KEDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGIPIAESRGSVPKDAKSTFCVMLRRYRGLKSGGFGVIGRPVSYEPFRLGLTFREAPEEARPDNYMVSNGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILSQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSETVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRADLKL
11wa9A 1.00 0.93 0.94 4.29Download -EDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGI------------AKSTFCVMLRRYRGLKSGGFGVIGRPVSYEPFRLGLTFREAPEEAR------SNGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILSQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSDTVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRAD---
27w80B 0.23 0.22 0.71 2.28Download ALEGFIAVVTQ-DGDMIFLSENISKFMGLTQVELTGHSIFDFTHPCDHEEIRENLT------------LVSTERDFFMRMKCT--VTNRGRTVNLKSATWKVLHCTGQVRVYNPL------------LSCLIIMCEPIQHPSHMDI---PLDSKTFLSRHSMDMKFTYCDDRILELIGYHPEELLGRSAYEFYHALDSENMTKSHQNLCTKGQ-----VVSGQYRMLAKHGGYVWLETQGTVIYNPRNLQPQCIMCVNYVLSEIEKNDVVFSMDQT---------------------------------------------------------------
31wa9 0.96 0.93 0.94 2.27Download KEDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGIP----------STFCVMLRRYRGLK------------PVSYEPFRLGLTFREAPEEARPDNYMVSNGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILSQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSDTVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRADLKL
41wa9 0.87 0.93 0.88 1.58Download KEDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGIP-------------STFCVMLRPYEPFRLGLTFREAPVSNGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEIL--------------------------SQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSDTVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRADLKL
51wa9B 0.99 0.93 0.94 4.14Download KEDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGIP-------------STFCVMLRRYRGL---------KPVSYEPFRLGLTFREAPEEARPDNYMVSNGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILSQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSDTVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRADLKL
61wa9 0.75 0.93 0.89 2.25Download -EDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGIPS---------TFCVMLRRYRGPVSYEPFRLGLTFREVSNGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILS--------------------------QKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNV-FEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSDTVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRADLK-
73rtyA 0.99 0.90 0.90 5.37Download KEDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGIPIAKS----------TFCVMLRRYR-------------VSYEPFRLGLTFREAPE----------EGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILSQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSETVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRADLKL
81wa9B 0.99 0.93 0.94 2.66Download KEDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGI-------------PSTFCVMLRRYRGLKPV---------SYEPFRLGLTFREAPEEARPDNYMVSNGTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILSQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSDTVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRADLKL
97v7lA 0.25 0.21 0.67 1.95Download AADGFLFIVSCETGRVVYVSDSVTPVLNQPQSEWFGSTLYDQVHPDDVDKLREQL--------STSENAMGSRRSFICRMRCGT----------SSEPHFVVVHCTGYIKAWP-----------QGSKFCLVAIGRLQVTSSPTDMSN-ICQPTEFISRHNIEGIFTFVDHRCVATVGYQPQELLGKNIVEFCHPEDQQLLRDSFQQVVKLKGQV----LSVMFRFRSKTREWLWMRTSSFTFQNPYSDEIEYIICTNTNV------------------------------------------------------------------------------
101wa9A 0.99 0.93 0.94 5.57Download -EDSFCCVISMHDGIVLYTTPSITDVLGYPRDMWLGRSFIDFVHLKDRATFASQITTGIA------------KSTFCVMLRRYRGLKSGGFGVIGRPVSYEPFRLGLTFREAPEEARSN------GTNMLLVICATPIKSSYKVPDEILSQKSPKFAIRHTATGIISHVDSAAVSALGYLPQDLIGRSIMDFYHHEDLSVMKETYETVMKKGQTAGASFCSKPYRFLIQNGCYVLLETEWTSFVNPWSRKLEFVVGHHRVFQGPKQCNVFEAAPTCKLKISEEAQSRNTRIKEDIVKRLAETVSRPSDTVKQEVSRRCQALASFMETLMDEVSRAD---
(a)All the residues are colored in black; however, those residues in template which are identical to the residue in the query sequence are highlighted in color. Coloring scheme is based on the property of amino acids, where polar are brightly coloured while non-polar residues are colored in dark shade. (more about the colors used)
(b)Rank of templates represents the top ten threading templates used by I-TASSER.
(c)Ident1 is the percentage sequence identity of the templates in the threading aligned region with the query sequence.
(d)Ident2 is the percentage sequence identity of the whole template chains with query sequence.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of the threading alignment and is equal to the number of aligned residues divided by the length of query protein.
(f)Norm. Z-score is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. Alignment with a Normalized Z-score >1 mean a good alignment and vice versa.
(g)Download Align. provides the 3D structure of the aligned regions of the threading templates.
(h)The top 10 alignments reported above (in order of their ranking) are from the following threading programs:
       1: FFAS-3D   2: SPARKS-X   3: HHSEARCH2   4: HHSEARCH I   5: Neff-PPAS   6: HHSEARCH   7: pGenTHREADER   8: wdPPAS   9: PROSPECT2   10: SP3   

   Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of a higher value signifies a model with a higher confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated; this is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
    (By right-click on the images, you can export image file or change the configurations, e.g. modifying the background color or stopping the spin of your models)
  • Download Model 1
  • C-score=0.41 (Read more about C-score)
  • Estimated TM-score = 0.77±0.10
  • Estimated RMSD = 5.6±3.5Å

  • Download Model 2
  • C-score = -1.59

  • Download Model 3
  • C-score = -3.17

  • Download Model 4
  • C-score = -2.27

  • Download Model 5
  • C-score = -4.23


  Proteins structurally close to the target in the PDB (as identified by TM-align)

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Click
to view		RankPDB HitTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovAlignment
11wa9B0.912 1.140.9870.935Download
23gecA0.736 1.130.9180.755Download
34dj3A0.724 2.740.2710.802Download
43gdiA0.680 2.350.2830.735Download
54dj2A0.670 2.790.2770.749Download
64f3lB0.594 2.440.2520.655Download
74kxfK0.422 5.310.0510.620Download
88gciA0.416 2.680.2500.463Download
95bv9A0.406 6.250.0350.652Download
107nurA0.401 6.410.0500.658Download

(a)Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.


  Predicted function using COFACTOR and COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COFACTOR and COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. While COFACTOR deduces protein functions (ligand-binding sites, EC and GO) using structure comparison and protein-protein networks, COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results (on ligand-binding sites) from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

  Ligand binding sites


Click
to view		RankC-scoreCluster
size		 PDB
Hit		 Lig
Name		 Download
Complex		 Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.23 13 4ghiA 0X3 Rep, Mult 156,158,160,164,166,189,192,193,201,204,205,208,221,224,226,238,254,256,258
20.04 2 3f1nA EDO Rep, Mult 164,201,204,219,221,238,256
30.02 1 4xwlA PGE Rep, Mult 46,49,50,182
40.02 1 3f1nA EDO N/A 190,191,193,195,198
50.02 1 5bv9A CA Rep, Mult 209,210,242,244


Download the residue-specific ligand binding probability, which is estimated by SVM.
Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites


Click
to view		RankCscoreECPDB
Hit		TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.2322gj3A0.287 2.770.1100.322 2.7.13.3  18,29
20.1802j5wA0.389 6.160.0450.614 1.16.3.1  NA
30.1771s5jA0.365 6.090.0510.581 2.7.7.7  NA
40.1741itzB0.323 6.540.0480.540 2.2.1.1  35
50.1722zxqA0.378 6.800.0530.652 3.2.1.97  NA

 Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms
Top 10 homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
1 0.710.9118 1.14 0.99 0.941wa9B GO:0004871 GO:0006355 GO:0007165
2 0.690.7359 1.13 0.92 0.763gecA GO:0004871 GO:0006355 GO:0007165
3 0.370.6798 2.35 0.28 0.733gdiA GO:0004871 GO:0005515 GO:0006355 GO:0007165
4 0.190.3148 1.97 0.28 0.343h82A GO:0004871 GO:0005515 GO:0006355 GO:0007165
5 0.180.3868 6.31 0.04 0.631f9dA GO:0016787 GO:0008810 GO:0008152 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0000272 GO:0005975 GO:0003824 GO:0004553
6 0.180.3891 6.16 0.04 0.612j5wA GO:0046872 GO:0005576 GO:0006879 GO:0005615 GO:0055085 GO:0005507 GO:0004322 GO:0005515 GO:0006811 GO:0016491 GO:0006810 GO:0051087 GO:0006825 GO:0055114
7 0.170.3806 6.56 0.06 0.642xpyA GO:0008152 GO:0003824 GO:0004177 GO:0004463 GO:0044255 GO:0005634 GO:0019370 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0005515 GO:0008270 GO:0004301 GO:0043171 GO:0005737 GO:0030163 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0005488 GO:0006508
8 0.170.3779 6.80 0.05 0.652zxqA GO:0007155
9 0.170.3041 6.79 0.01 0.511nhxA GO:0005625 GO:0005634 GO:0000287 GO:0005525 GO:0019003 GO:0004613 GO:0004611 GO:0031406 GO:0032868 GO:0016831 GO:0030145 GO:0005829 GO:0006107 GO:0042593 GO:0046327 GO:0005730 GO:0006094 GO:0005975 GO:0006629 GO:0000166 GO:0046872 GO:0005737 GO:0016829 GO:0006006 GO:0014823 GO:0017076
10 0.170.3210 6.81 0.03 0.562g25A GO:0004742 GO:0055114 GO:0005829 GO:0006086 GO:0045254 GO:0046872 GO:0031405 GO:0006096 GO:0016020 GO:0004739 GO:0016491 GO:0005515 GO:0003824 GO:0008152


Consensus prediction of GO terms		 
Molecular Function GO:0004871 GO:0005515
GO-Score 0.95 0.48
Biological Process GO:0006355 GO:0007165 GO:0030243 GO:0009251
GO-Score 0.95 0.95 0.36 0.36
Cellular Component None was predicted

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.


[Click on S776148_results.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modeling results listed on this page]


Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
  • Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. Cell Reports Methods, 1: 100014 (2021).
  • Chengxin Zhang, Peter L. Freddolino, and Yang Zhang. COFACTOR: improved protein function prediction by combining structure, sequence and protein-protein interaction information. Nucleic Acids Research, 45: W291-299 (2017).
  • Jianyi Yang, Yang Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.