[Home] [Server] [Queue] [About] [Remove] [Statistics]

I-TASSER results for job id S776151

(Click on S776151_results.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modeling results listed on this page. Click on Annotation of I-TASSER Output to read the instructions for how to interpret the results on this page. Model results are kept on the server for 60 days, there is no way to retrieve the modeling data older than 2 months)

  Submitted Sequence in FASTA format

>protein
MARTDQKPPCRGGCWGQPGHPNTGGAAAHPTYHPMGHRPRTCILLRGDQTTGGQAPSREI
SLGPWAAGTHFLAISTTPWGRKTPACISELPTSSGTAQPLANAVCEVQTVPGPGLRPQGT
PAMRAPSHKGTPPTPNPWGPEQPQNRHKHPKKGVTGGPSPPPPAASRYGQTPGREPRVQA
PGLGPCGRPASGRLLSLHLEKGDGKGTRQRIPLTDAAVGGDRTDIPSAIAAGPARTPDRH
GLPIPGSTPTPMVGSGRLGAPVGRSGGGASARSSRPSCANVLLRADASLGTVLSVLWTGQ
LSRGWALLPPGDAGRHLETSVISAGVAAGIWLVEPGEAAQDPATRRTAPPRRTASPEPPA
PGAPLPACPGRIPGAARFGPRSHPLGSPAVLAVTTGWSHRSV

  Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300                 320                 340                 360                 380                 400
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |  
MARTDQKPPCRGGCWGQPGHPNTGGAAAHPTYHPMGHRPRTCILLRGDQTTGGQAPSREISLGPWAAGTHFLAISTTPWGRKTPACISELPTSSGTAQPLANAVCEVQTVPGPGLRPQGTPAMRAPSHKGTPPTPNPWGPEQPQNRHKHPKKGVTGGPSPPPPAASRYGQTPGREPRVQAPGLGPCGRPASGRLLSLHLEKGDGKGTRQRIPLTDAAVGGDRTDIPSAIAAGPARTPDRHGLPIPGSTPTPMVGSGRLGAPVGRSGGGASARSSRPSCANVLLRADASLGTVLSVLWTGQLSRGWALLPPGDAGRHLETSVISAGVAAGIWLVEPGEAAQDPATRRTAPPRRTASPEPPAPGAPLPACPGRIPGAARFGPRSHPLGSPAVLAVTTGWSHRSV
PredictionCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCC
Conf.Score975567898657646888898877645577657667887337887236556776775411236321452532224677667674113213333688765520002000267865378888555685446888898877878887555688887668999998555556778887788778887878888752011010102787544454667667777644555431003677888767772788898875453324776433566410135688743301104666565214114566665544458500024476420115544577534666223686544468887777898976678677887777764444776788898616886314434469
H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

  Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300                 320                 340                 360                 380                 400
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |  
MARTDQKPPCRGGCWGQPGHPNTGGAAAHPTYHPMGHRPRTCILLRGDQTTGGQAPSREISLGPWAAGTHFLAISTTPWGRKTPACISELPTSSGTAQPLANAVCEVQTVPGPGLRPQGTPAMRAPSHKGTPPTPNPWGPEQPQNRHKHPKKGVTGGPSPPPPAASRYGQTPGREPRVQAPGLGPCGRPASGRLLSLHLEKGDGKGTRQRIPLTDAAVGGDRTDIPSAIAAGPARTPDRHGLPIPGSTPTPMVGSGRLGAPVGRSGGGASARSSRPSCANVLLRADASLGTVLSVLWTGQLSRGWALLPPGDAGRHLETSVISAGVAAGIWLVEPGEAAQDPATRRTAPPRRTASPEPPAPGAPLPACPGRIPGAARFGPRSHPLGSPAVLAVTTGWSHRSV
Prediction743466423131101132232431222221223223331200000102433335234341311211000000000213233302100340244533133013010313414144133633322333646341434531337426533433441243334233431542353444524251432131233131200201044662633344130343333354532330023121423633302133433231134231101113432334344433303300030223000000000214213010002234113303221031223211110433623544344433344443436343372324203331321141324513122100000012144447
Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 9 (highly exposed residue)

   Predicted normalized B-factor

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)


  Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

(I-TASSER modeling starts from the structure templates identified by LOMETS from the PDB library. LOMETS is a meta-server threading approach containing multiple threading programs, where each threading program can generate tens of thousands of template alignments. I-TASSER only uses the templates of the highest significance in the threading alignments, the significance of which are measured by the Z-score, i.e. the difference between the raw and average scores in the unit of standard deviation. The templates in this section are the 10 best templates selected from the LOMETS threading programs. Usually, one template of the highest Z-score is selected from each threading program, where the threading programs are sorted by the average performance in the large-scale benchmark test experiments.)

Rank PDB
Hit		Iden1Iden2CovNorm.
Z-score		Download
Align.		                   20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300                 320                 340                 360                 380                 400
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |  
Sec.Str
Seq		CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCC
MARTDQKPPCRGGCWGQPGHPNTGGAAAHPTYHPMGHRPRTCILLRGDQTTGGQAPSREISLGPWAAGTHFLAISTTPWGRKTPACISELPTSSGTAQPLANAVCEVQTVPGPGLRPQGTPAMRAPSHKGTPPTPNPWGPEQPQNRHKHPKKGVTGGPSPPPPAASRYGQTPGREPRVQAPGLGPCGRPASGRLLSLHLEKGDGKGTRQRIPLTDAAVGGDRTDIPSAIAAGPARTPDRHGLPIPGSTPTPMVGSGRLGAPVGRSGGGASARSSRPSCANVLLRADASLGTVLSVLWTGQLSRGWALLPPGDAGRHLETSVISAGVAAGIWLVEPGEAAQDPATRRTAPPRRTASPEPPAPGAPLPACPGRIPGAARFGPRSHPLGSPAVLAVTTGWSHRSV
13zueA 0.12 0.26 0.90 0.70Download -ARSLEPPDLRPNMYHPTGDPGLVPTLVLSVYNNLIN------------PFGGSTSAIQVTVETRPSEDFEFVMIRAPSSKTV----DSISPAGLLTTPVLTGVGNDNRWNGQIVGLQPVPGGFSTCNRHWNLNGSTYGWSSPRFADIDHRRGSASYPGNNATNVLQFWANAGSAVDNPISQVAPDGFPDMSFVPFNGPGIPAAGWVGFGAIWNSNSGAPNVTTVQAYELGFATGAPGNLQPTTNTSGAQTVAKSIYAVVTGTAQNPAGLFVMASGVISTPNANAIT---------------------YTPQPDRIVTTPGTPAAAPVGKNTP---IMFASVVRRTGDVNATAGSASGTQYGTGSQPLPVTIGLSLNNYSSSLMPGQFFVWQLTFGYFYAGT
28fdgA 0.08 0.34 0.98 1.06Download FIYGKRHPMRGESVTVTMDNVGTWMLTSMNSSPRSKKLRLKFRDVKCIPDDDEDSYEIFEPPESTVMATDRLEPEDEESDADYDYQNRLAAGIRSFRNSSLNQEEEEFNLTAALENGTEFVSSNTDIIVGSNYSSPSNILGMPSPSSPTLNDTFLSKEFNPLVIVGL-----SKDGTDYIEIIPKEEVQSSEDDYAEIDYVPYDDPYKTDVRTNINSSRDPDNIAAWYLRSNNGNREFVQRETDIEDSDDIPEDTTYKKVVLDSTFTKRDPRGEYEEHLGILPIIRAEVDDVIQVRFKNLASRPYSLHAHGKSSEGKTYEDDSPEWFKEDNAVQPNHATERSGPESPGSACRAVNPEKDIHSGPLLICQKGILHKDSNMPV--DMREFVLLFMTFDEKKSWY
32nbiA 0.09 0.25 1.00 1.33Download FGRPDCDVLPTPQNINCPRCCATECRPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPICSPTMLPTNQPTPPEPSSAPSDCGEVIEECPLDTCPTSDPARPPDCTAVGRPDCDVLPFPNNLGCPACCPFECSPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPNCSPTMLPTPQPSTPTVITSPAPSSQPSQCAEVIEQCPIDECFLPYGDSSRPLDCTDPAVNRPDCDVLPTPQNINCPACCAFECRPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPICSPTMMPSPEPSSQPSDCGEVIEECPIDACFLPKSDSARPPDCTAVGRPDCVLPFPNNIGCPSCCPFECSPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPNCSPTMLPSPSPSAVTVPLTPAPSSAPTRQPSSQPTGPQPSSQPSECADVLELCPYDTCFLPFDDSSRPPDCTDPSVNRPDCDKL
42zw6A 0.30 0.07 0.07 0.83Download ---------------------------------------------------GDPPEFAEAALTPWSAGPRFRLAAVPG------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
52nbiA 0.15 0.24 0.94 1.06Download SSQPSECADVLEECPIDECFLPYSDASRPPSCLSFG-RPDC-----DVLPTPQNINCPRCCATECRPDN----PMFTPSPDGSPP--ICSPTMLPTNQPTPPEPSSAPSDCGEVIEECPLDTCFLPTSPARPPDCTAVGPDCDVLPFPNNLGCPACCPFECSPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPNCSPTMLPTPQPTVITSPAPSSQPSQCAEVIEQCPIDECFYGDSSRPLDCTDPAVNRPDCDVLPTPQNINCPACCAFECRPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPICSPTMMPS--PEPSSQPSDCGEVIEECPIDACFLPKSDSARPPDCTAVGRPDCNVLPFPNNIGCPSCCPFECSPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPNCSPTMLPSPSPSAVTVPLTPAPSSAPTR------------
62nbiA 0.08 0.25 1.00 3.53Download -LSFGRPDCDVLPTPQNINCPRCCATECRPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPICSPTMLPTNQPSAPSDCGEVIEECPLDTCFLPTSDPARPPDCTAVGRPDCDVLPFPNNLGCPACCPFECNPMFTPSPDGSPPNCSPTMLPTPQPSTPTVITSPAPSSQPSQCAEVIEQCPIDECFLPYGDSSRPLDCTDPAVNRPDCDVLPTPQNINCPACCAFECRPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPICSPTMMPSPEPSSQPSDCGEVIEECPIDACFLPKSDSARPPDCTAVGRPDCNVLPFPNNIGCPSCCPFECSPDNPMFTPSPDPSSQPSECADVLELCPYDTCFLPFDDSSRPPDCTDPSVNRPDCDKLSTAIDFTCPTCCPTQCRPDNPMFSPSPDGSPPVCSPTMMPSPLPSP
72tld 0.20 0.10 0.24 0.81Download ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------SALYAPSALVLTVGKGVSAAPERAVTLTCAPGPGTHPAAGSACADLA-AVGGDLALTRGEDVGCPKV----Y-DPVLLTGKRVSYERVFNEC--EMNAHGS---SVFAF-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82nbiA 0.15 0.25 0.97 2.45Download LPYSDASRPPSCLSFGRPDCDVLPTPQATECRPDNPMFTPS-----PDGSPPICSPTMLPTNQPTPPEPSSAPSDCGEVIEECPLDTCFLPTSDPARPPDCTAVGRPDCDVLPFPNNLGCPACCPFECSPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPNCSPTPTPQPSTPTVITSPAPSSQPSQCAEVPYGDSSRPLDCTDPAVNRPDCDVLPTPQNINCPACCAFECRPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPICSPTMMPSPEPSSQPSDCGEVIEECPIDACFLPKSSARPPDCTAVGRPDCNVLPFPNNIGCPSCCPFECSPDNPMFTPSPDGSPPNCSPTMLPSPSPSAVTVPLTPAPSSAPTRQPSSQPTG-PQPSSQPSECADVLELCPYDTCFLPFDDSSRPP-------DCTDPSV
95m5zA 0.19 0.12 0.31 1.69Download ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RSRPQYEDVPVSSFVSVKANGAKGDGVTDDTDAIQAIFDSVTPE---QIVYFDHG-----AYII-TKTVPPNIRITG-----------------EALPLILAGGDFFANPKPVFQVG--------QPGE------------------------------R-GRVESDLIFGTAGP---QP--GAIMMEWNVAGM
108wxbY 0.09 0.21 1.00 2.22Download IAETDSGQTVTGTQANRSLKTTGNEASTCRTVTGTQYMGAEVTGQFCQDKPKYKQPIRASEVGRSEKVTGDEPGTCKNLTGTEYISANQSKKYCGEVIKKPSKVMQSITTDGSLPGRSSLVTGDESGSGKQLTGDQYLGSEPSPKGKSFEKVGSYDTLNGNNVTGTGVGRSDYVTGNEYGSCKNLTGDEYIGSQQYEKFCGSTPKPEARKVGLSLSSKSNLISGTMTGRSKIVTGDEPGSCKVLTGTPYALQPGIGGVMTGATKGSCKNLTGTPYIGGDQFLSNCETPPNDASYANQEKSASNSWKEFSVNSPSREKYSAVTGNRYEDSSKITGPFDMAEDKVITGEGQSAGNITGDDWDRGDKVTGTEGVSARKRNPSRAGFMGAMPPVDNKRNDETEKPD
(a)All the residues are colored in black; however, those residues in template which are identical to the residue in the query sequence are highlighted in color. Coloring scheme is based on the property of amino acids, where polar are brightly coloured while non-polar residues are colored in dark shade. (more about the colors used)
(b)Rank of templates represents the top ten threading templates used by I-TASSER.
(c)Ident1 is the percentage sequence identity of the templates in the threading aligned region with the query sequence.
(d)Ident2 is the percentage sequence identity of the whole template chains with query sequence.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of the threading alignment and is equal to the number of aligned residues divided by the length of query protein.
(f)Norm. Z-score is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. Alignment with a Normalized Z-score >1 mean a good alignment and vice versa.
(g)Download Align. provides the 3D structure of the aligned regions of the threading templates.
(h)The top 10 alignments reported above (in order of their ranking) are from the following threading programs:
       1: FFAS-3D   2: SPARKS-X   3: SP3   4: HHSEARCH   5: wdPPAS   6: Neff-PPAS   7: HHSEARCH2   8: pGenTHREADER   9: HHSEARCH I   10: PROSPECT2   

   Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of a higher value signifies a model with a higher confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated; this is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
    (By right-click on the images, you can export image file or change the configurations, e.g. modifying the background color or stopping the spin of your models)
  • Download Model 1
  • C-score=-2.07 (Read more about C-score)
  • Estimated TM-score = 0.47±0.15
  • Estimated RMSD = 11.7±4.5Å

  • Download Model 2
  • C-score = -2.05

  • Download Model 3
  • C-score = -1.03

  • Download Model 4
  • C-score = -1.38

  • Download Model 5
  • C-score = -3.32


  Proteins structurally close to the target in the PDB (as identified by TM-align)

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Click
to view		RankPDB HitTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovAlignment
13zueA0.879 1.370.1100.900Download
22gh8A0.670 3.570.0850.764Download
33m8lA0.632 3.940.0570.746Download
47dodC0.620 4.640.0690.786Download
57mryA0.605 4.260.0620.761Download
66otfB0.595 4.510.0760.774Download
77n6yA0.592 4.460.0840.769Download
88vgrA0.581 5.070.0620.791Download
96ou9B0.575 4.800.0830.756Download
101ihmB0.570 4.590.0930.739Download

(a)Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.


  Predicted function using COFACTOR and COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COFACTOR and COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. While COFACTOR deduces protein functions (ligand-binding sites, EC and GO) using structure comparison and protein-protein networks, COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results (on ligand-binding sites) from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

  Ligand binding sites


Click
to view		RankC-scoreCluster
size		 PDB
Hit		 Lig
Name		 Download
Complex		 Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.06 3 4ftsB Nuc.Acid Rep, Mult 372,375
20.04 2 3aspA FUC Rep, Mult 153,277
30.04 2 3bpxA SAL Rep, Mult 367,371
40.04 2 3vggA GLC Rep, Mult 309,311
50.02 1 4rm0B GAL Rep, Mult 273,276,281


Download the residue-specific ligand binding probability, which is estimated by SVM.
Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites


Click
to view		RankCscoreECPDB
Hit		TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0981sliA0.330 7.160.0440.555 4.2.2.15 3.2.1.18  NA
20.0951sllA0.328 7.240.0380.555 4.2.2.15  NA
30.0923dy5A0.337 7.270.0450.582 1.13.11.40 4.2.1.92  NA
40.0923fg3A0.336 7.410.0310.582 4.2.1.92 1.13.11.40  NA
50.0913l4uA0.329 6.860.0420.540 3.2.1.20 3.2.1.3  318

 Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms
Top 10 homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
1 0.150.5703 4.59 0.09 0.741ihmB GO:0030430 GO:0019012 GO:0019028
2 0.120.4554 3.67 0.11 0.542zl5A GO:0019012 GO:0030430 GO:0019028
3 0.100.3301 7.16 0.04 0.551sliA GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0033995 GO:0005615 GO:0016798 GO:0016829 GO:0005576 GO:0004308 GO:0005975
4 0.090.3364 7.41 0.03 0.583fg3A GO:0055114 GO:0016491 GO:0008152 GO:0047677 GO:0046872 GO:0016829 GO:0008610 GO:0016020 GO:0006633 GO:0047987 GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0031408 GO:0016702 GO:0005506 GO:0005515 GO:0006691 GO:0016165
5 0.090.3372 7.27 0.04 0.583dy5A GO:0016829 GO:0031408 GO:0008610 GO:0047677 GO:0016020 GO:0055114 GO:0016491 GO:0008152 GO:0047987 GO:0016702 GO:0003824 GO:0046872 GO:0005737 GO:0006633 GO:0004096 GO:0005506 GO:0005515 GO:0006691 GO:0006979 GO:0016165
6 0.090.3292 6.86 0.04 0.543l4uA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0030246
7 0.090.3285 6.78 0.02 0.533lppA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0030246
8 0.080.3292 7.52 0.06 0.592pffA GO:0008610 GO:0000287 GO:0009058 GO:0005829 GO:0005835 GO:0006633 GO:0004316 GO:0004321 GO:0005515 GO:0009059 GO:0016740 GO:0005488 GO:0008897 GO:0004312 GO:0008152 GO:0005737 GO:0016491 GO:0004315 GO:0005739 GO:0055114 GO:0003824
9 0.080.3314 6.97 0.03 0.563iydD GO:0016740 GO:0005515 GO:0006351 GO:0016779 GO:0016020 GO:0003899 GO:0005737 GO:0003677
10 0.070.3572 6.54 0.03 0.561bglA GO:0046872 GO:0016787 GO:0005990 GO:0016798 GO:0005515 GO:0004565 GO:0008152 GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0009341 GO:0030246 GO:0043169


Consensus prediction of GO terms		 
Molecular Function GO:0051213 GO:0016701 GO:0043167 GO:0016836
GO-Score 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.33
Biological Process GO:0006690 GO:0046394 GO:0043449 GO:0031407
GO-Score 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
Cellular Component GO:0033646 GO:0044423 GO:0044424
GO-Score 0.50 0.50 0.35

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.


[Click on S776151_results.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modeling results listed on this page]


Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
  • Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. Cell Reports Methods, 1: 100014 (2021).
  • Chengxin Zhang, Peter L. Freddolino, and Yang Zhang. COFACTOR: improved protein function prediction by combining structure, sequence and protein-protein interaction information. Nucleic Acids Research, 45: W291-299 (2017).
  • Jianyi Yang, Yang Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.