[Home] [Server] [Queue] [About] [Remove] [Statistics]

I-TASSER results for job id S778291

(Click on S778291_results.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modeling results listed on this page. Click on Annotation of I-TASSER Output to read the instructions for how to interpret the results on this page. Model results are kept on the server for 60 days, there is no way to retrieve the modeling data older than 2 months)

  Submitted Sequence in FASTA format

>protein
MKKTAIAIAVALAGFATVAQAMRISKPHLRSISIQCYLCLLLNSHFLTEAGIHVFILGCF
SAGLPKTEANWVNVISDLKKIEDLIQSMHIDATLYTESDVHPSCKVTAMKCFLLELQVIS
LESGDASIHDTVENLIILANNSLSSNGNVTESGCKECEELEEKNIKEFLQSFVHIVQMFI
NTS

  Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |   
MKKTAIAIAVALAGFATVAQAMRISKPHLRSISIQCYLCLLLNSHFLTEAGIHVFILGCFSAGLPKTEANWVNVISDLKKIEDLIQSMHIDATLYTESDVHPSCKVTAMKCFLLELQVISLESGDASIHDTVENLIILANNSLSSNGNVTESGCKECEELEEKNIKEFLQSFVHIVQMFINTS
PredictionCCCHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSSSHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCC
Conf.Score972033466641420789999874545876534999999999988743678678763410101304555617899789999975232133523306776676788899999999999999986133066899999999873326588968667851787500587999999999999851798
H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

  Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |   
MKKTAIAIAVALAGFATVAQAMRISKPHLRSISIQCYLCLLLNSHFLTEAGIHVFILGCFSAGLPKTEANWVNVISDLKKIEDLIQSMHIDATLYTESDVHPSCKVTAMKCFLLELQVISLESGDASIHDTVENLIILANNSLSSNGNVTESGCKECEELEEKNIKEFLQSFVHIVQMFINTS
Prediction754212010333443430243142343204422030100000102113423020001011010123352434302520630461354341313012455346504321030132303002321635614530330033135405547534574154046367560340042014004313458
Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 9 (highly exposed residue)

   Predicted normalized B-factor

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)


  Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

(I-TASSER modeling starts from the structure templates identified by LOMETS from the PDB library. LOMETS is a meta-server threading approach containing multiple threading programs, where each threading program can generate tens of thousands of template alignments. I-TASSER only uses the templates of the highest significance in the threading alignments, the significance of which are measured by the Z-score, i.e. the difference between the raw and average scores in the unit of standard deviation. The templates in this section are the 10 best templates selected from the LOMETS threading programs. Usually, one template of the highest Z-score is selected from each threading program, where the threading programs are sorted by the average performance in the large-scale benchmark test experiments.)

Rank PDB
Hit
Iden1Iden2CovNorm.
Z-score
Download
Align.
                   20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180
                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |   
Sec.Str
Seq
CCCHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSSSSSSHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCC
MKKTAIAIAVALAGFATVAQAMRISKPHLRSISIQCYLCLLLNSHFLTEAGIHVFILGCFSAGLPKTEANWVNVISDLKKIEDLIQSMHIDATLYTESDVHPSCKVTAMKCFLLELQVISLESGDASIHDTVENLIILANNSLSSNGNVTESGCKECEELEEKNIKEFLQSFVHIVQMFINTS
12z3rA 0.97 0.65 0.64 2.63Download -----------------------------------------------------------------MAISNWVNVISDLKKIEDLIQSMHIDATLYTESDVHPSCKVTAMKCFLLELQVISLESGDASIHDTVENLIILANNSLSSNGNVTESGCKECEELEEKNIKEFLQSFVHIVQMFINTS
28entA 0.18 0.17 0.63 0.99Download ---------------------------------------------------------------QDRHMIRMRQLIDIVDQLKNYVNDLVPE-FLPAPEDVETNCEWSAFSCFQKA---QLKSANTGNNERIIQVSIKKLKRKPPSTNQKHRLTCPSCDSYEKKPPKEFLERFKSLLQKMIHQH
32psm 0.68 0.45 0.64 5.38Download ------------------------------------------------------------------SSGNWIDVRYDLEKIESLIQSIHIDTTLYTDSDFHPSCKVTAMNCFLLELQVILHEYSNMTLNETVRNVLYLANSTLSSNKNVAESGCKECEELEEKTFTEFLQSFIRIVQMFINTS
42z3r 0.96 0.64 0.64 4.13Download ----------------------------------------------------------------AMAISNWVNVISDLKKIEDLIQSMHIDATLYTESDVHPSCKVTAMKCFLLELQVISLESGDASIHDTVENLIILANNSLSSNGNVTESGCKECEELEEKNIKEFLQSFVHIVQMFINT-
52psmA 0.68 0.45 0.64 1.54Download ------------------------------------------------------------------SSGNWIDVRYDLEKIESLIQSIHIDTTLYTDSDFHPSCKVTAMNCFLLELQVILHEYSNMTLNETVRNVLYLANSTLSSNKNVAESGCKECEELEEKTFTEFLQSFIRIVQMFINTS
62psm 0.68 0.45 0.63 6.53Download ------------------------------------------------------------------SSGNWIDVRYDLEKIESLIQSIHIDTTLYTDSDFHPSCKVTAMNCFLLELQVILHEYSNMTLNETVRNVLYLANSTLSSNKNVAESGCKECEELEEKTFTEFLQSFIRIVQMFINT-
72z3qA 0.96 0.62 0.62 3.01Download ----------------------------------------------------------------AMAISNWVNVISDLKKIEDLIQSMHIDATLYTESDVHPSCKVTAMKCFLLELQVISLESGDASIHDTVENLIILANNSLS-----TESGCKECEELEEKNIKEFLQSFVHIVQMFINTS
82psmA 0.68 0.45 0.64 1.69Download ------------------------------------------------------------------SSGNWIDVRYDLEKIESLIQSIHIDTTLYTDSDFHPSCKVTAMNCFLLELQVILHEYSNMTLNETVRNVLYLANSTLSSNKNVAESGCKECEELEEKTFTEFLQSFIRIVQMFINTS
98entA 0.18 0.17 0.63 0.97Download QDR------------------------------------HMIR---------------------------MRQLIDIVDQLKNYVNDLVPEF-LPAPEDVETNCEWSAFSCF---QKAQLKSANTGNNERIIQVSIKKLKRKPPSTNQKHRLTCPSCDSYEKKPPKEFLERFKSLLQKMIHQT
102psmA 0.68 0.45 0.64 3.66Download ------------------------------------------------------------------SSGNWIDVRYDLEKIESLIQSIHIDTTLYTDSDFHPSCKVTAMNCFLLELQVILHEYSNMTLNETVRNVLYLANSTLSSNKNVAESGCKECEELEEKTFTEFLQSFIRIVQMFINTS
(a)All the residues are colored in black; however, those residues in template which are identical to the residue in the query sequence are highlighted in color. Coloring scheme is based on the property of amino acids, where polar are brightly coloured while non-polar residues are colored in dark shade. (more about the colors used)
(b)Rank of templates represents the top ten threading templates used by I-TASSER.
(c)Ident1 is the percentage sequence identity of the templates in the threading aligned region with the query sequence.
(d)Ident2 is the percentage sequence identity of the whole template chains with query sequence.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of the threading alignment and is equal to the number of aligned residues divided by the length of query protein.
(f)Norm. Z-score is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. Alignment with a Normalized Z-score >1 mean a good alignment and vice versa.
(g)Download Align. provides the 3D structure of the aligned regions of the threading templates.
(h)The top 10 alignments reported above (in order of their ranking) are from the following threading programs:
       1: FFAS-3D   2: SPARKS-X   3: HHSEARCH2   4: HHSEARCH I   5: Neff-PPAS   6: HHSEARCH   7: pGenTHREADER   8: wdPPAS   9: PROSPECT2   10: SP3   

   Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of a higher value signifies a model with a higher confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated; this is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
    (By right-click on the images, you can export image file or change the configurations, e.g. modifying the background color or stopping the spin of your models)
  • Download Model 1
  • C-score=-2.10 (Read more about C-score)
  • Estimated TM-score = 0.46±0.15
  • Estimated RMSD = 9.8±4.6Å

  • Download Model 2
  • C-score = -2.24

  • Download Model 3
  • C-score = -2.29

  • Download Model 4
  • C-score = -3.68

  • Download Model 5
  • C-score = -3.55


  Proteins structurally close to the target in the PDB (as identified by TM-align)

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Click
to view
RankPDB HitTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovAlignment
12z3rE0.635 0.820.9580.650Download
22psmA0.621 0.880.6840.639Download
36thaA0.560 3.740.0530.754Download
44ldsA0.559 4.000.0920.765Download
57crzA0.546 4.210.0330.754Download
64ybqA0.545 3.930.0520.738Download
72q7nB0.544 4.100.0940.749Download
86m2lA0.539 4.190.0590.749Download
97t3nA0.537 4.410.0930.765Download
106h7dA0.537 4.370.0420.781Download

(a)Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.


  Predicted function using COFACTOR and COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COFACTOR and COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. While COFACTOR deduces protein functions (ligand-binding sites, EC and GO) using structure comparison and protein-protein networks, COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results (on ligand-binding sites) from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

  Ligand binding sites


Click
to view
RankC-scoreCluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 9 1qvnA FRI Rep, Mult 90,92,93,95,112,119,122,123
20.05 5 1py2A FRH Rep, Mult 91,93,94,95,96,112,115,119,122,123,162
30.04 3 1au1A G6D Rep, Mult 80,134
40.04 3 4ni9C Nuc.Acid Rep, Mult 66,69,70,72,73,75,76,133,137,138,141,144,145,177,181
50.04 4 4d2bA 78N Rep, Mult 71,74,75,78,135,139


Download the residue-specific ligand binding probability, which is estimated by SVM.
Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites


Click
to view
RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.1252iukA0.343 5.410.0400.607 1.13.11.12  70
20.1201ut9A0.447 4.890.0380.689 3.2.1.4  NA
30.1181jqkF0.427 5.480.0560.765 1.2.99.2  NA
40.1101smsA0.428 3.850.0300.579 1.17.4.1  NA
50.1101qi9B0.426 5.290.0340.727 1.11.1.10  NA

 Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms
Top 10 homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
1 0.230.6354 0.82 0.96 0.652z3rE GO:0005126 GO:0005576 GO:0006955
2 0.230.6211 0.88 0.68 0.642psmA GO:0005126 GO:0005576 GO:0006955
3 0.140.5443 4.10 0.09 0.752q7nB GO:0051461 GO:0048708 GO:0033141 GO:0008083 GO:0005125 GO:0048286 GO:0031100 GO:0060463 GO:0060290 GO:0008284 GO:0005146 GO:0001974 GO:0042517 GO:0045835 GO:0019827 GO:0005102 GO:0042511 GO:0072108 GO:0010976 GO:0007275 GO:0005576 GO:0008285 GO:0060426 GO:0060708 GO:0016525 GO:0060707 GO:0045944 GO:0042503 GO:0048666 GO:0048861 GO:0007566 GO:0030324 GO:0005615 GO:0050731 GO:0046888 GO:0045595 GO:0048711 GO:0043410 GO:0046697 GO:0045651 GO:0033138 GO:0048644 GO:0060135 GO:0072307 GO:0070373 GO:0060041 GO:0006955
4 0.140.5309 3.59 0.07 0.691a7mA GO:0050731 GO:0048666 GO:0010976 GO:0048708 GO:0016525 GO:0048861 GO:0048286 GO:0033138 GO:0005576 GO:0033141 GO:0043410 GO:0070373 GO:0005125 GO:0008083 GO:0045651 GO:0042503 GO:0060707 GO:0030324 GO:0005146 GO:0042511 GO:0005615 GO:0051461 GO:0045835 GO:0008284 GO:0060463 GO:0008285 GO:0060708 GO:0060426 GO:0019827 GO:0007566 GO:0048644 GO:0042517 GO:0048711 GO:0005102 GO:0072307 GO:0060135 GO:0031100 GO:0045595 GO:0060290 GO:0046697 GO:0001974 GO:0072108 GO:0060041 GO:0046888 GO:0045944 GO:0006955
5 0.140.5021 3.13 0.10 0.633ejjA GO:0005125 GO:0008083 GO:0016021
6 0.130.5001 2.96 0.08 0.621hmcA GO:0005125 GO:0008083 GO:0016021
7 0.130.4926 3.15 0.11 0.631exzB GO:0016020 GO:0005173 GO:0007155
8 0.130.4947 3.37 0.07 0.661buyA GO:0043249 GO:0033574 GO:0042523 GO:0032496 GO:0010766 GO:0005615 GO:0051602 GO:0001666 GO:0048678 GO:0070555 GO:0006357 GO:0042541 GO:0043526 GO:0007568 GO:0046579 GO:0033189 GO:0043627 GO:0008284 GO:0071474 GO:0006915 GO:0055093 GO:0043499 GO:0007584 GO:0043066 GO:0005515 GO:0045893 GO:0007566 GO:0030218 GO:0045666 GO:0045740 GO:0032413 GO:0009651 GO:0008015 GO:0005576 GO:0005179 GO:0007165 GO:0005128
9 0.130.4878 3.00 0.14 0.622o26A GO:0005173 GO:0007155 GO:0016020
10 0.130.5173 2.78 0.18 0.612oqpA GO:0005134 GO:0045078 GO:0048469 GO:0005125 GO:0005615 GO:0005126 GO:0032733 GO:0007165 GO:0032740 GO:0034105 GO:0042102 GO:0045954 GO:0002729 GO:0050729 GO:0005576 GO:0032825 GO:0006955


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005126 GO:0005125 GO:0008083
GO-Score 0.41 0.36 0.36
Biological Process GO:0006955 GO:0031099 GO:0001893 GO:0048864 GO:0010948 GO:0060706 GO:0051459 GO:0045649 GO:0045687 GO:0045596
GO-Score 0.56 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
Cellular Component GO:0044421
GO-Score 0.52

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.


[Click on S778291_results.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modeling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
  • Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. Cell Reports Methods, 1: 100014 (2021).
  • Chengxin Zhang, Peter L. Freddolino, and Yang Zhang. COFACTOR: improved protein function prediction by combining structure, sequence and protein-protein interaction information. Nucleic Acids Research, 45: W291-299 (2017).
  • Jianyi Yang, Yang Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.